How to Identify Fake Case Studies from GRC Manufacturers?

You can identify fraudulent GRC manufacturer cases through four major methods: verifying project information, on-site inspection, checking technical details, and investigating qualifications and reputation. Qinglong advises customers to avoid the misconception of "only looking at pictures without verifying evidence" and to ensure cases are authentic and traceable through multi-dimensional verification, avoiding project risks caused by choosing fraudulent manufacturers.

I. Verify Project Information: Identify Signs of Fraud at the Source

Authentic cases come with complete, traceable project information. Request core documents: key contract pages (stamped pages, project name, supply scope), completion acceptance reports, and client feedback—fraudulent manufacturers often cannot provide complete documents, or their documents have issues such as blurred stamps or contradictory information; Verify project authenticity: check whether the project exists through the project's official website, government bidding platforms, and news reports, focusing on whether the project name, construction entity, and construction period match the manufacturer's description. Qinglong's cases can be verified through winning-bid information on bidding platforms, ensuring they are authentic and traceable; Confirm supply relevance: request the manufacturer's specific supply scope in the project (such as curtain walls, moldings, and sculptures), work quantities, and photos of key milestones—fraudulent manufacturers may confuse "participating in a project" with "leading the supply," or be unable to clarify their supply scope.

II. On-Site Inspection: Directly Judge Case Authenticity

On-site inspection is the most effective way to identify fraud. Inspect completed projects: contact the project's construction entity or property management, and inspect GRC components on site for appearance quality, service life, and issues such as cracking or peeling. Authentic cases withstand on-site inspection, and Qinglong supports customer inspections of any completed project; Inspect the production base: check whether the manufacturer has the corresponding production capacity and process capability—if a manufacturer claims to have undertaken extra-large, complex GRC components but its production base lacks automated equipment and has crude molds, fraud is highly likely; Verify production records: request to review the production ledgers for the case (batching sheets, curing records, factory inspection reports). For authentic cases, production records match the project schedule and supply volume. Qinglong keeps production ledgers for 10 years, available for verification at any time.

III. Verify Technical Details: Identify Flaws from a Professional Perspective

Fraudulent cases often contain contradictions in technical details. Ask about key technical parameters: such as GRC thickness, strength grade, fiber content, and curing period—fraudulent manufacturers may give vague answers, or their parameters may not match industry norms or project requirements; Check process feasibility: for complex shapes in the case (such as double-curved surfaces and large spans), ask about detailed design approaches, mold processing methods, and installation techniques—fraudulent manufacturers may be unable to explain clearly, or their process logic may be contradictory; Compare product consistency: check whether the GRC appearance in case photos (surface texture, joints, color) matches the manufacturer's samples—fraudulent cases may show large differences in texture between photos and samples. All Qinglong case photos are actual shots, and samples are completely consistent with project products.

IV. Check Qualifications and Reputation: Support Verification of Case Authenticity

A manufacturer's qualifications and reputation can indirectly corroborate case authenticity. Check industry certifications: whether it is a member of the China GRC Association or the International GRC Association, and whether it holds qualifications such as High-Tech Enterprise or Specialized and Innovative Enterprise—fraudulent manufacturers often lack authoritative certifications; Check awards: if major project cases claim awards (such as the Luban Award or Quality Engineering Award), verify the award list on the awarding body's official website to confirm whether the manufacturer was an award recipient. Qinglong's Shenzhen Pingshan High-Tech Zone Comprehensive Service Center project won the Luban Award, which can be verified on the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development's official website; Understand market reputation: learn about the manufacturer's reputation through peer recommendations, industry forums, and third-party review platforms—fraudulent manufacturers may have many negative reviews or extremely low industry recognition. Qinglong has long-term partnerships with leading companies such as Poly, China Overseas, and Vanke, and its reputation can be cross-verified.